illegality$37477$ - traduzione in olandese
Diclib.com
Dizionario ChatGPT
Inserisci una parola o una frase in qualsiasi lingua 👆
Lingua:

Traduzione e analisi delle parole tramite l'intelligenza artificiale ChatGPT

In questa pagina puoi ottenere un'analisi dettagliata di una parola o frase, prodotta utilizzando la migliore tecnologia di intelligenza artificiale fino ad oggi:

  • come viene usata la parola
  • frequenza di utilizzo
  • è usato più spesso nel discorso orale o scritto
  • opzioni di traduzione delle parole
  • esempi di utilizzo (varie frasi con traduzione)
  • etimologia

illegality$37477$ - traduzione in olandese

COMMON LAW DOCTRINE
Ex turpi causa; Illegality defence; Illegality defense

illegality      
n. onwettigheid
ex turpi causa         
bewijsmateriaal dat van oorsprong onwettelijk was
law violation         
ACT THAT IS ILLEGAL OR IMMORAL
Illegality; Wrongness; Miscreants; Wrong doing; Wrongdoer; Wrong doer; Wrong-doer; Wrong-doing; Wrongdoers; Wrong doers; Wrong-doers; Wrongful act; Wrongs; Legal wrong; Violation of laws; Violation of law; Legal wrongs; Wrong; Law violation; Legal violation; Violation of the law; Violations of the law; Wrongly; Misdeed
het niet nakomen van de wet

Definizione

wrongdoing
(wrongdoings)
Wrongdoing is behaviour that is illegal or immoral.
The city attorney's office hasn't found any evidence of criminal wrongdoing.
N-VAR

Wikipedia

Ex turpi causa non oritur actio

Ex turpi causa non oritur actio (Latin "from a dishonorable cause an action does not arise") is a legal doctrine which states that a plaintiff will be unable to pursue legal relief and damages if it arises in connection with their own tortious act. Particularly relevant in the law of contract, tort and trusts, ex turpi causa is also known as the illegality defence, since a defendant may plead that even though, for instance, he broke a contract, conducted himself negligently or broke an equitable duty, nevertheless a claimant by reason of his own illegality cannot sue. The UK Supreme Court provided a thorough reconsideration of the doctrine in 2016 in Patel v Mirza.